Storytellers Are Better Writers

1 other approach to emphasize the theme is through all of the characters in a story, with each character representing an aspect of the theme, as in Godfather tales when the subject of power is presented with each character representing another aspect of power.

The simple fact is that at a certain sense itself is fiction. Just like a story it’s a beginning, an end, and lot of stuff in between. We do not know who writes this fiction nor will ever know. So we’ve got an innate affinity with fiction and cannot fully detach ourselves from it. And perhaps that’s why, while studying or viewing fiction we get lost subconsciously in the wonderland of creativity, but for that brief period we function exactly in the same way as we would in the real world of our understanding. In that sense fiction is simply invented reality.

And I am only speaking here of references to proper names and names. Additionally, there are inferences that have to be created and understood if the job is to be properly appreciated. By Way of Example, a woman complains about her philosophy course:

Let’s begin with Tripmaster Monkey. Kingston’s novel is astoundingly erudite, and her erudition is mainly responsible for what concerns me. How so? Only this – the first chapter (I’m using the first paperback Classic variant of July, 1990) runs from page three to page thirty five. In that space I rely forty references to either literature or theatre. (The remainder of the book is substantially the same, although perhaps not in quite so high a ratio.) I will list a few of them shortly for purposes of illustration.

Character growth can be one of the most important things about writing fiction. You want to create a realistic set of personalities to move your plot along and to do this you want to understand them. But how much can you must know about these before you start writing?

In a philosophical sense that the phenomenal world itself may be considered fiction. That is exactly what Shakespeare possibly meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all men and women merely players”. We might as well consider everything in the universe (space, time, matter) as gamers since everything has its own entrance and exit. We of course run into the problem of stating what the point is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare most likely believed in God, strict determinism, also at the reality of the world, so he didn’t have this issue. Now it’s generally thought that the universe also includes a beginning and will have an end. If the universe is also a player, are there multiple universes or does it come alone on the stage and then introduces other players? But what’s the point in this case? Quantum physics points to one possibility. At extremely tiny scales of space and time there is a quantum void that’s not really empty but filled with energy which is constantly transforming itself to virtual particles and back. What remains after the conclusion of the universe could possibly be an infinite version of this quantum void filled with energy into which each of the thing has converted itself. This universal energy is the origin of and background for all. There is so much for you to learn about go to website, and we definitely can guide you in this area. As always, though, much of what you determine you need is totally dependent on what you want to achieve. The most innocuous details can sometimes hold the most important keys as well as the greatest power. No matter what, your careful attention to the matter at hand is something you and all of us have to do. The remainder of this article will present you with a few more very hot ideas about this.

It is not merely a philosophical point. We spend a considerable part of our own life in the imagined or fictional world. We muse about the items in future and also dwell over the past imagining what might have been. The creativity about the future is dependent on our hopes and aspirations and also to some extent it’s a positive in the sense that we are in a position to mold our future if we sincerely try. But musing within the past is a futile exercise since we know for a fact that ‘what could have been’ is mere fantasy that never happened. Nevertheless it serves the exact same purpose as fiction in the perspective of amusement. We amuse ourselves by imagining how life would have been, knowing fully well that it has no reality whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense past, at the remote past, is fiction. In a particular sense history itself is fiction since it always includes the subjective bias of the writer. What we understand of Buddha and Jesus today is much more fiction than facts.

Another frequent technique is hinting at the theme from the dialogue, but the danger here is in becoming too obvious. Although this may be carried out successfully by a seasoned writer, the beginning writer should try to stay away from blurting out the theme through the dialogue.

Even if the plot is all about something from the author’s imagination that may not emotionally involve us the narrative becomes memorable if the theme makes itself known. We may not care for Luke Skywalker’s intergalactic triumph as much as we care about good winning over evil. Theme is extremely important to the overall success of almost any piece of fiction. When managed deftly, it will become a loyal servant to any author.

Theme enriches and inspires the reader when saying something profound about the human condition. Theme is the abstract concept behind the story forming the story’s heart and soul which the exposition, dialogue, and action reflect every chance they get. There are different approaches you can follow when storytelling.

“Knowledge is limited, imagination is not.” Albert Einstein said that although the wording of the second part might have been different. Einstein like any other human being wasn’t infallible. A number of his views he held right till the end turned out to be incorrect even in the subject of physics. In this particular announcement also he appears to have it backwards. Knowledge may be limited in the case of someone but generally it is infinite even when we consider just rational understanding leaving apart transcendental. Science in particular has demonstrated this at each step in the course of its development. Imagination pertains to a single mind and can be constrained by numerous things depending on the circumstances of the individual. A mind can imagine only what happens in some way to matters already stored in it. A person who has been outdoors a remote place in wilderness and has no contact with the world outside cannot envision what metropolitan cities would be like.

This brings us to the reason for psychological reaction itself. In regard to fiction that the most common emotions are likes and dislikes that could become their stronger forms of love and hate. In real life we love or hate someone because of a few attachment through kinship, friendship, or even through indirect understanding of the individual. An individual cannot love or hate a person one does not understand at all. Attachment can also be to other living beings, material things, and to fanciful things. We love or despise a story or even an idea. For an ordinary person it is impossible to live unattached to items on the planet. If one can eliminate attachment, one unites the rank of enlightened souls who are indeed rare. We carry our capacity and desire for attachment into the imaginary world of fiction. We see the characters we come to know as the narrative progresses, form our preferences, and react in precisely the identical manner like in real life except we cannot interact together physically. But we do interact together in our heads and hearts from where the emotions come.

Leave a Reply